Table of Contents
Never ever had an engine problem. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I wonder exactly how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's own way ... the 300i6 would do whatever I require this truck to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the automobile world refuse to break.
those need to be held as the criteria to which everything else is measured. sadly, practically everything else fades in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 certainly) Wow, due to the outpour of appreciation, it looked good so I bought it, here's the ad lmk what you people think Oops, really did not mean to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz though, I'm relatively large, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly slim ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only issue I've ever seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little too difficult and they would break right at the floorboard.
Bear in mind the gas mileage will not be the most effective on the planet, however it will certainly damn sure run permanently. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had a lot of area in the cab of them. wbjones created: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never ever had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply sounded like a diesel. I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time getting out of it's own way ... The engine bay had not been made for anything longer than a Mod motor. One Canister remove an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, but it draws.
"They are usually dependable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
Rust is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 highway with the OD5. I question just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I really did not make clear ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I included that factor since when I had to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go with each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that had not been sludged up actually severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to talk regarding a couple of issues of these vans, however I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is much better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same car.
They appear to be a little bit more used because location, but, you know, those are a few of the uses, but they're basically the very same classification of automobile. Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines after that. What issues do you see in between these two automobiles? Bernie: Yeah. So let's speak about engine and in fact simply to specify that the version years, we're mosting likely to begin with 2000 and up, you understand, I mean, these vans have been around for a long period of time.
And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around considering that, you recognize, around that time too. We're not going to get back into, right into the earlier things. Considering that 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more preferred and I would not actually recommend a V6 engine.
There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with strike to these engines, since they didn't have enough threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered issues.
Extremely really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't explain ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I added that factor because when I needed to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to locate one that wasn't sludged up actually badly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to chat about a couple of issues of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Let's speak concerning engine and actually just to define that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I mean, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has been around since, you know, around that time too. We're not going to get back right into, right into the earlier things. Since 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more popular and I would not actually advise a V6 engine.
You know, Fords, and many of them come with the Triton V8. There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 ignition system with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they didn't have sufficient threading in the ignition system, which created problems. And usually that would certainly occur when you could be in a 15 guest bus going up a hill with a lots of individuals and all of a sudden boom, a stimulate plug bulges and you're stranded.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealership around San Francisco, California